New International Version (©1984) He denied it again, with an oath: "I don't know the man!"New Living Translation (©2007) Again Peter denied it, this time with an oath. "I don't even know the man," he said. English Standard Version (©2001) And again he denied it with an oath: “I do not know the man.” New American Standard Bible (©1995) And again he denied it with an oath, "I do not know the man." King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) And again he denied with an oath, I do not know the man. International Standard Version (©2008) Again he denied it and swore with an oath, "I don't know the man!" Aramaic Bible in Plain English (©2010) And again he denied with an oath, “I do not know the man.” GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995) Again Peter denied it and swore with an oath, "I don't know the man!" King James 2000 Bible (©2003) And again he denied it with an oath, I do not know the man. American King James Version And again he denied with an oath, I do not know the man. American Standard Version And again he denied with an oath, I know not the man. Douay-Rheims Bible And again he denied with an oath, I know not the man. Darby Bible Translation And again he denied with an oath: I do not know the man. English Revised Version And again he denied with an oath, I know not the man. Webster's Bible Translation And again he denied with an oath, I do not know the man. Weymouth New Testament Again he denied it with an oath. "I do not know the man," he said. World English Bible Again he denied it with an oath, "I don't know the man." Young's Literal Translation and again did he deny with an oath -- 'I have not known the man.' |
| Clarke's Commentary on the Bible And again he denied with an oath - This is a third gradation of his iniquity. He has told a lie, and he swears to support it. A liar has always some suspicion that his testimony is not credited, for he is conscious to his own falsity, and is therefore naturally led to support his assertions by oaths. Gill's Exposition of the Entire BibleAnd again he denied with an oath,.... He denied a second time, that he had ever been with Jesus, or was a disciple of his; and to put it out of all doubt, and an end to all dispute about it, and further charge of this kind, as he hoped, he annexed an oath to it: he swore by the God of truth; made a solemn appeal to the omniscient God, the searcher of hearts, that he was so far from being ever with Jesus of Nazareth, or a disciple of his, that, says he, I do not know the man: meaning not only that he had no personal knowledge of him, or acquaintance with him; but that he had never seen the man in his life, nor did he know what manner of man he was. This, as it was a downright falsehood, it was what he had no need to have said; for there were multitudes that knew Christ in this sense, who never joined with him, or became his disciples. This was so much overdoing it, that it was much it had not given them a suspicion of him. Those that would excuse Peter's sin, by supposing that he meant, that he knew Christ to be God, and did not know him as a mere man, have no foundation for such a supposition; and indeed, such an ambiguous expression, and mental reservation, is no other than dealing fallaciously. Peter knew Christ in every sense; he knew him spiritually, whom to know is life eternal: and he valued the knowledge of him above all things else: he knew him to be God, and the Son of God; he knew him as mediator, and the Saviour of lost sinners; he knew him as man, and had had personal intimacy and conversation with him of a long time, and yet now denies he knew him; and that with an oath, adding perjury to lying; and so it is, that one sin leads on to another. This instance of Peter's shows the wickedness and deceitfulness of man's heart; and what the best of men are, or would be, when left to themselves, and of God: they become like other men, even like the men of the world, whose mouths are full of cursing and bitterness. Vincent's Word StudiesThe man As if he did not know Jesus' name. Geneva Study BibleAnd again he denied with an oath, I do not know the man. People's New Testament 26:72 He denied with an oath, I do not know the man. Peter's second denial. He even denied knowing him, and that, too, with an oath. He had entered upon the downward road, and each step called for a deeper one. So it is always with sin. Wesley's Notes 26:72 He denied with an oath - To which possibly he was not unaccustomed, before our Lord called him. Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary26:69-75 Peter's sin is truly related, for the Scriptures deal faithfully. Bad company leads to sin: those who needlessly thrust themselves into it, may expect to be tempted and insnared, as Peter. They scarcely can come out of such company without guilt or grief, or both. It is a great fault to be shy of Christ; and to dissemble our knowledge of him, when we are called to own him, is, in effect, to deny him. Peter's sin was aggravated; but he fell into the sin by surprise, not as Judas, with design. But conscience should be to us as the crowing of the cock, to put us in mind of the sins we had forgotten. Peter was thus left to fall, to abate his self-confidence, and render him more modest, humble, compassionate, and useful to others. The event has taught believers many things ever since, and if infidels, Pharisees, and hypocrites stumble at it or abuse it, it is at their peril. Little do we know how we should act in very difficult situations, if we were left to ourselves. Let him, therefore, that thinketh he standeth, take heed lest he fall; let us all distrust our own hearts, and rely wholly on the Lord. Peter wept bitterly. Sorrow for sin must not be slight, but great and deep. Peter, who wept so bitterly for denying Christ, never denied him again, but confessed him often in the face of danger. True repentance for any sin will be shown by the contrary grace and duty; that is a sign of our sorrowing not only bitterly, but sincerely. |