New International Version (©1984) If he called them 'gods,' to whom the word of God came--and the Scripture cannot be broken--New Living Translation (©2007) And you know that the Scriptures cannot be altered. So if those people who received God's message were called 'gods,' English Standard Version (©2001) If he called them gods to whom the word of God came—and Scripture cannot be broken— New American Standard Bible (©1995) "If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; International Standard Version (©2008) If he called those to whom the word of God came 'gods' (and the Scripture cannot be disregarded), Aramaic Bible in Plain English (©2010) “If he called those men gods because The Word of God was with them and the scripture cannot be destroyed”, GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995) The Scriptures cannot be discredited. So if God calls people gods (and they are the people to whom he gave the Scriptures), King James 2000 Bible (©2003) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; American King James Version If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; American Standard Version If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came (and the scripture cannot be broken), Douay-Rheims Bible If he called them gods, to whom to word of God was spoken, and the scripture cannot be broken; Darby Bible Translation If he called them gods to whom the word of God came (and the scripture cannot be broken), English Revised Version If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came (and the scripture cannot be broken), Webster's Bible Translation If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; Weymouth New Testament If those to whom God's word was addressed are called gods (and the Scripture cannot be annulled) World English Bible If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture can't be broken), Young's Literal Translation if them he did call gods unto whom the word of God came, (and the Writing is not able to be broken,) |
| Barnes' Notes on the Bible Unto whom the word of God came - That is, who were his servants, or who received their dignity and honor only because the law of God was intrusted to them. "The Word of God" here means the command of God; his commission to them to do justice. The scripture cannot be broken - See Matthew 5:19. The authority of the Scripture is final; it cannot be set aside. The meaning is, "If, therefore, the Scripture uses the word "god" אלהים ̀elohiym as applied to magistrates, it settles the question that it is right to apply the term to those in office and authority. If applied to them, it may be to others in similar offices. It cannot, therefore, be blasphemy to use this word as applicable to a personage so much more exalted than mere magistrates as the Messiah." Clarke's Commentary on the BibleUnto whom the word of God came - Bishop Pearce thinks that "the word λογος, here, is put for λογος κρισεως, the word or matter of judgment, as in 2 Chronicles 19:6, where Jehoshaphat, setting up judges in the land of Judah, says: Take heed what ye do: judge not for men, but for the Lord, who is with you in judgment - λογοι της κρισεως, in the words or matters of judgment, - Sept., which is nearly according to the Hebrew to בדבר משפט bedebar mishpat, in the word or matter of judgment. In Deuteronomy 1:17, when a charge is given to the judges that they should not be afraid of the face of man, this reason is given: for the judgment is God's. Hence it appears probable that λογος is here used for λογος κρισεως: and it is called λογος Θεου, because it is the judgment that properly belongs to God, and which they who give it on earth give only as acting in the stead of God. A way of speaking very like to this is found in Hebrews 4:13, where the writer says, προς ὁν ἡμιν ὁ λογος, with whom we have to do, i.e. by whom we are to be judged." But the words λογος Θεου may be here understood for the order, commission, or command of God; and so it properly signifies, Luke 3:2; and in this sense it is found often employed in the Old Testament. When it is there said that the word of the Lord came, etc., it means, God gave an order, commission, etc., to such a person, to declare or do such and such things. And the scripture cannot be broken - Λυθηναι, dissolved, rendered of none effect, i.e. it cannot be gainsayed or set aside; every man must believe this, because it is the declaration of God. If those were termed gods who were only earthly magistrates, fallible mortals, and had no particular influence of the Divine Spirit; and that they are termed gods is evident from that scripture which cannot be gainsayed; what greater reason then have I to say, I am the Son of God, and one with God, when, as Messiah, I have been consecrated, sent into the world, to instruct and save men; and when, as God, I have wrought miracles which could be performed by no power less than that of omnipotence? Gill's Exposition of the Entire BibleIf he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came,.... The Syriac version reads, "because the word of God came to them"; either the divine "Logos", the essential word, the Son of God, who appeared to Moses, and made him a God to Pharaoh, and who appointed rulers and magistrates among the Jews; and who is the King of kings, and Lord of lords, from whom all receive their power and dominion: this sense is favoured by the Ethiopic version, which renders it, "if he called them gods to whom God appeared, the word of God was with them": or else the commission from God, authorizing them to act in the capacity of rulers and governors, is here meant; or rather the word of God, which, in the passage of Scripture cited, calls them so, as it certainly does: and the Scripture cannot be broken; or be made null and void; whatever that says is true, there is no contradicting it, or objecting to it: it is a Jewish way of speaking, much used in the Talmud (y); when one doctor has produced an argument, or instance, in any point of debate, another says, , "it may be broken"; or objected to, in such and such a manner, and be refuted: but the Scripture cannot be broken, that is not to be objected to, there can be no confutation of that. (y) T. Bab. Zebachim, fol. 4. 1. & Becorot, fol. 32. 1. & passim. Vincent's Word StudiesThe Scripture (ἡ γραφή) The passage of scripture. See on John 2:22; see on John 5:47. Broken (λυθῆναι) Literally, loosened. Wyc., undone. The word is characteristic of John. He uses it of the destruction of the temple (John 2:19); the breaking of the Sabbath (John 5:18); the violation of the law (John 7:23); the destruction of Satan's works (1 John 3:8), besides elsewhere in the physical sense. Geneva Study BibleIf he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be {l} broken; (l) Void and of no effect. Wesley's Notes 10:35 If he (God) called them gods unto whom the word of God came, (that is, to whom God was then speaking,) and the Scripture cannot be broken - That is, nothing which is written therein can be censured or rejected. Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary35, 36. If he called them gods unto whom the word of God came . Say ye of him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest-The whole force of this reasoning, which has been but in part seized by the commentators, lies in what is said of the two parties compared. The comparison of Himself with mere men, divinely commissioned, is intended to show (as Neander well expresses it) that the idea of a communication of the Divine Majesty to human nature was by no means foreign to the revelations of the Old Testament; but there is also a contrast between Himself and all merely human representatives of God-the one "sanctified by the Father and sent into the world"; the other, "to whom the word of God (merely) came," which is expressly designed to prevent His being massed up with them as only one of many human officials of God. It is never said of Christ that "the word of the Lord came to Him"; whereas this is the well-known formula by which the divine commission, even to the highest of mere men, is expressed, as John the Baptist (Lu 3:2). The reason is that given by the Baptist himself (see on [1825]Joh 3:31). The contrast is between those "to whom the word of God came"-men of the earth, earthy, who were merely privileged to get a divine message to utter (if prophets), or a divine office to discharge (if judges)-and "Him whom (not being of the earth at all) the Father sanctified (or set apart), and sent into the world," an expression never used of any merely human messenger of God, and used only of Himself. because, I said, I am the Son of God-It is worthy of special notice that our Lord had not said, in so many words, that He was the Son of God, on this occasion. But He had said what beyond doubt amounted to it-namely, that He gave His sheep eternal life, and none could pluck them out of His hand; that He had got them from His Father, in whose hands, though given to Him, they still remained, and out of whose hand none could pluck them; and that they were the indefeasible property of both, inasmuch as "He and His Father were one." Our Lord considers all this as just saying of Himself, "I am the Son of God"-one nature with Him, yet mysteriously of Him. The parenthesis (Joh 10:35), "and the Scripture cannot be broken," referring to the terms used of magistrates in the eighty-second Psalm, has an important bearing on the authority of the living oracles. "The Scripture, as the expressed will of the unchangeable God, is itself unchangeable and indissoluble" [Olshausen]. (Compare Mt 5:17). Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary10:31-38 Christ's works of power and mercy proclaim him to be over all, God blessed for evermore, that all may know and believe He is in the Father, and the Father in Him. Whom the Father sends, he sanctifies. The holy God will reward, and therefore will employ, none but such as he makes holy. The Father was in the Son, so that by Divine power he wrought his miracles; the Son was so in the Father, that he knew the whole of His mind. This we cannot by searching find out to perfection, but we may know and believe these declarations of Christ. |